Strobes VIStrobes VI
CVE DatabaseThreat ActorsResearchAdvisoryAPI Docs
Visit Strobes.coSign Up for Strobes
CVE DatabaseThreat ActorsResearchAdvisoryAPI Docs
Tools
KB Lookup
Visit Strobes.coSign Up for Strobes
HomeCVEs

Do you like the insights?

Strobes vulnerability intelligence is a key component of their Exposure Management platform that helps organizations understand, prioritize, and address security vulnerabilities more effectively.

© 2026 Strobes Security. All rights reserved.
HomeCVEsCVE-2025-68202

CVE-2025-68202

Published: February 3, 2026
Last updated:17 hours ago (February 3, 2026)
Exploit: NoZero-day: NoPatch: YesTrend: Neutral
TL;DR
Updated February 3, 2026

CVE-2025-68202 is a low severity vulnerability with a CVSS score of 0.0. No known exploits currently, and patches are available.

Key Points
  • 1Low severity (CVSS 0.0/10)
  • 2No known public exploits
  • 3Vendor patches are available
Severity Scores
CVSS v30.0
CVSS v20.0
Priority Score0.0
EPSS Score0.0
None
Exploitation LikelihoodMinimal
0.00%EPSS

Very low probability of exploitation

Monitor and patch as resources allow
0.00%
EPSS
0.0
CVSS
No
Exploit
Yes
Patch
Low Priority
no major risk factors

EPSS predicts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days based on real-world threat data, complementing CVSS severity scores with actual risk assessment.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched_ext: Fix unsafe locking in the scx_dump_state()

For built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y kernels, the dump_lock will be converted sleepable spinlock and not disable-irq, so the following scenarios occur:

inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. irq_work/0/27 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (&rq->__lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40 {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: lock_acquire+0x1e1/0x510 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x42/0x80 raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40 sched_tick+0xae/0x7b0 update_process_times+0x14c/0x1b0 tick_periodic+0x62/0x1f0 tick_handle_periodic+0x48/0xf0 timer_interrupt+0x55/0x80 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20a/0x5c0 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x18/0xc0 handle_irq_event+0xb5/0x150 handle_level_irq+0x220/0x460 __common_interrupt+0xa2/0x1e0 common_interrupt+0xb0/0xd0 asm_common_interrupt+0x2b/0x40 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x45/0x80 __setup_irq+0xc34/0x1a30 request_threaded_irq+0x214/0x2f0 hpet_time_init+0x3e/0x60 x86_late_time_init+0x5b/0xb0 start_kernel+0x308/0x410 x86_64_start_reservations+0x1c/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x96/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x148

other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario:

    CPU0
    ----

lock(&rq->__lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 27 Comm: irq_work/0 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xd0 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 print_usage_bug+0x42e/0x690 mark_lock.part.44+0x867/0xa70 ? __pfx_mark_lock.part.44+0x10/0x10 ? string_nocheck+0x19c/0x310 ? number+0x739/0x9f0 ? __pfx_string_nocheck+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_check_pointer+0x10/0x10 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x15/0x30 ? sched_clock_noinstr+0xd/0x20 ? local_clock_noinstr+0x1c/0xe0 __lock_acquire+0xc4b/0x62b0 ? __pfx_format_decode+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_string+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_vsnprintf+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1e1/0x510 ? raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? dump_line+0x12e/0x270 ? raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x20/0x40 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x42/0x80 ? raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40 raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40 scx_dump_state+0x3b3/0x1270 ? finish_task_switch+0x27e/0x840 scx_ops_error_irq_workfn+0x67/0x80 irq_work_single+0x113/0x260 irq_work_run_list.part.3+0x44/0x70 run_irq_workd+0x6b/0x90 ? __pfx_run_irq_workd+0x10/0x10 smpboot_thread_fn+0x529/0x870 ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x305/0x3f0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x40/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>

This commit therefore use rq_lock_irqsave/irqrestore() to replace rq_lock/unlock() in the scx_dump_state().

CVSS v3 Breakdown
Attack Vector:-
Attack Complexity:-
Privileges Required:-
User Interaction:-
Scope:-
Confidentiality:-
Integrity:-
Availability:-
Trend Analysis
Neutral
Advisories
GitHub AdvisoryNVD
Cite This Page
APA Format
Strobes VI. (2026). CVE-2025-68202 - CVE Details and Analysis. Strobes VI. Retrieved February 3, 2026, from https://vi.strobes.co/cve/CVE-2025-68202
Quick copy link + title

Please cite this page when referencing data from Strobes VI. Proper attribution helps support our vulnerability intelligence research.