Strobes VIStrobes VI
CVE DatabaseThreat ActorsResearchAdvisoryAPI Docs
Visit Strobes.coSign Up for Strobes
CVE DatabaseThreat ActorsResearchAdvisoryAPI Docs
Tools
KB Lookup
Visit Strobes.coSign Up for Strobes
HomeCVEs

Do you like the insights?

Strobes vulnerability intelligence is a key component of their Exposure Management platform that helps organizations understand, prioritize, and address security vulnerabilities more effectively.

© 2026 Strobes Security. All rights reserved.
HomeCVEsCVE-2025-40303

CVE-2025-40303

Published: February 11, 2026
Last updated:6 hours ago (February 11, 2026)
Exploit: NoZero-day: NoPatch: YesTrend: Neutral
TL;DR
Updated February 11, 2026

CVE-2025-40303 is a low severity vulnerability with a CVSS score of 0.0. No known exploits currently, and patches are available.

Key Points
  • 1Low severity (CVSS 0.0/10)
  • 2No known public exploits
  • 3Vendor patches are available
Severity Scores
CVSS v30.0
CVSS v20.0
Priority Score0.0
EPSS Score0.0
None
Exploitation LikelihoodMinimal
0.00%EPSS

Very low probability of exploitation

Monitor and patch as resources allow
0.00%
EPSS
0.0
CVSS
No
Exploit
Yes
Patch
Low Priority
no major risk factors

EPSS predicts the probability of exploitation in the next 30 days based on real-world threat data, complementing CVSS severity scores with actual risk assessment.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: ensure no dirty metadata is written back for an fs with errors

[BUG] During development of a minor feature (make sure all btrfs_bio::end_io() is called in task context), I noticed a crash in generic/388, where metadata writes triggered new works after btrfs_stop_all_workers().

It turns out that it can even happen without any code modification, just using RAID5 for metadata and the same workload from generic/388 is going to trigger the use-after-free.

[CAUSE] If btrfs hits an error, the fs is marked as error, no new transaction is allowed thus metadata is in a frozen state.

But there are some metadata modifications before that error, and they are still in the btree inode page cache.

Since there will be no real transaction commit, all those dirty folios are just kept as is in the page cache, and they can not be invalidated by invalidate_inode_pages2() call inside close_ctree(), because they are dirty.

And finally after btrfs_stop_all_workers(), we call iput() on btree inode, which triggers writeback of those dirty metadata.

And if the fs is using RAID56 metadata, this will trigger RMW and queue new works into rmw_workers, which is already stopped, causing warning from queue_work() and use-after-free.

[FIX] Add a special handling for write_one_eb(), that if the fs is already in an error state, immediately mark the bbio as failure, instead of really submitting them.

Then during close_ctree(), iput() will just discard all those dirty tree blocks without really writing them back, thus no more new jobs for already stopped-and-freed workqueues.

The extra discard in write_one_eb() also acts as an extra safenet. E.g. the transaction abort is triggered by some extent/free space tree corruptions, and since extent/free space tree is already corrupted some tree blocks may be allocated where they shouldn't be (overwriting existing tree blocks). In that case writing them back will further corrupting the fs.

CVSS v3 Breakdown
Attack Vector:-
Attack Complexity:-
Privileges Required:-
User Interaction:-
Scope:-
Confidentiality:-
Integrity:-
Availability:-
Trend Analysis
Neutral
Advisories
GitHub AdvisoryNVD
Cite This Page
APA Format
Strobes VI. (2026). CVE-2025-40303 - CVE Details and Analysis. Strobes VI. Retrieved February 11, 2026, from https://vi.strobes.co/cve/CVE-2025-40303
Quick copy link + title

Please cite this page when referencing data from Strobes VI. Proper attribution helps support our vulnerability intelligence research.